Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!lll-tis!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!CORY.BERKELEY.EDU!dillon
From: dillon@CORY.BERKELEY.EDU (Matt Dillon)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: FFS speed.  Bytes per second or Bits per second?
Message-ID: <8802251923.AA23029@cory.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 25 Feb 88 19:23:03 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Lines: 12

>cmcmanis@sun.UUCP (Chuck McManis) wrote:
>>Yes it stinks, yes it is fixed by the Fast File system
>
>I've seen an A2000 with Connor 100M disk on a CBM 2090 controller
>running FFS; they're getting around 600 Bytes/sec.  Yum.

	Don't you mean:  600Kbps .. 600K BITS/sec

	Considering the transfer rate for a hard disk, I don't think
FFS can go at 600K Bytes/sec.   600Kbps-1Mbps ==  75KBps-125KBps.
(That is, with normal hard disks).

					-Matt