Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!decvax!ucbvax!ucdavis!caldwr!kwongj From: kwongj@caldwr.caldwr.gov (James Kwong) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo Subject: Re: DSP90/MSD-500 Disk Errors Keywords: MSD-500, disk errors, disk address 1 Message-ID: <312@caldwr.caldwr.gov> Date: 17 Feb 88 18:05:15 GMT References: <8802151918.AA11087@EDDIE.MIT.EDU> <3392@super.upenn.edu> Organization: California Department of Water Resources Lines: 58 In article <3392@super.upenn.edu>, adam@hyper.lap.upenn.edu (Adam Feigin) writes: > Well, I'm starting to suspect that there's something wrong with the > disk controller (either the multibus SMD board or the drive electronics > itself) as the MSD-500 was replaced in June with a BRAND NEW CDC drive, > and yet these errors keep occuring (I'm thankful that Apollo ISN'T > vanilla U**X, as errors on the first disk address would be disastrous !!) > When you get these errors, are they at the first address on the disk, or > are they at various places on the media (We also get errors at assorted > disk addresses, but the errors at the first disk address happen at least > once or twice a week) ?? > > Adam > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ We're having the same problem here with our DSP90/Control Data Corp.500 mb. storage module except the header errors always occur on vol. 1 addr 1. A service rep. came out and moved the label to another spot on the storage module (ran some kind of fix_vol or something like that) and salvol the disk to no avail. We still get the disk block header error now and then. I noticed that if I partnered the DSP 90 to a diskless node the frequency of the error messages increased from once every several months to once every few days. I was told basically the same thing; the problem was probably caused by a grounding problem somewhere, that it was common among the DSP 90s and that the errors probably occurred when the disk is in a reading mode, and not writing mode and as such I should not have to worry too much about the integrity of the data. Still though, I would feel less paronoid if these errors didn't crop up now and then. In your case with the errors occuring at different spots, your assessment of the cause sounds reasonable. I take it that these header messages (other that vol. 1 addr 1) also refer to the the storage module and not the error messages caused by specifying non-existing devices on the DSP 90 such as a cartridge drive or floppy drive. Excerpt from our 'lsyserr': Friday, December 18, 1987 3:45:19 pm (PST) disk error storage module, volx=1, daddr=1: disk block header error (OS/disk manager) Monday, December 21, 1987 3:14:54 pm (PST) disk error storage module, volx=1, daddr=1: disk block header error (OS/disk manager) James Kwong Calif. Depart. of H2O Resources, Sacramento, CA 95802 ucdavis.edu!caldwr!kwongj (Internet) ...!ucbvax!ucdavis!caldwr!kwongj (UUCP) -- James Kwong Calif. Depart. of H2O Resources, Sacramento, CA 95802 ucdavis.edu!caldwr!kwongj (Internet) ...!ucbvax!ucdavis!caldwr!kwongj (UUCP) "Our program who art in memory, HELLO be thy name.. " The opinions expressed above are mine, not those of the State of California or the California Department of Water Resources.