Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!yale!Ram-Ashwin
From: Ram-Ashwin@cs.yale.edu (Ashwin Ram)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Bad (but ANY) placing of Atari ST binaries
Message-ID: <23660@yale-celray.yale.UUCP>
Date: 22 Feb 88 19:39:29 GMT
References: <386@csvax.liv.ac.uk> <4460@eagle.ukc.ac.uk>
Sender: root@yale.UUCP
Reply-To: Ram-Ashwin@cs.yale.edu (Ashwin Ram)
Organization: Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-2158
Lines: 19
In-reply-to: jbww@eagle.ukc.ac.uk (J.B.W.Webber)


In article <4460@eagle.ukc.ac.uk>, jbww@eagle (J.B.W.Webber) writes:
> Surely ANY posting of binaries and source is better than none.

Yes!

> Yes, the sources and binary groups are the right place, but I think the 
> time has now come to post here, rather than nowhere.

If the bottleneck is in moderation, why not just make comp.binaries.atari.st
unmoderated and post binaries there?  I agree with Richard Lloyd that one
shouldn't need to sift through comp.sys.atari.st just to find programs that one
wants.  Surely posting unmoderated binaries to comp.binaries.atari.st is better
than posting unmoderated binaries to comp.sys.atari.st!

-- Ashwin Ram --

ARPA:    Ram-Ashwin@cs.yale.edu
UUCP:    {decvax,ucbvax,harvard,cmcl2,...}!yale!Ram-Ashwin
BITNET:  Ram@yalecs