Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!lll-tis!ames!elroy!cit-vax!oberon!nunki.usc.edu!castor.usc.edu!rjung
From: rjung@castor.usc.edu (Robert Jung)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Atari no-support?
Message-ID: <318@nunki.usc.edu>
Date: 24 Feb 88 05:46:14 GMT
References: <192@umn-d-ub.D.UMN.EDU> <864@usl-pc.UUCP> <1003@its63b.ed.ac.uk> <3334@watcgl.waterloo.edu>
Sender: news@nunki.usc.edu
Reply-To: rjung@castor.usc.edu (Robert Jung)
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Lines: 27
Keywords: developers
Summary: I'm getting kinda worried, guys...


  You know, after reading Matt Singer bash Atari's unprofessionalism,
I'm beginning to wonder: How many Atari software developers out here in
netland have *Major* gripes with how Atari supports the ST?

  I'm not a professional, nothing fancy, just a "Joe User" who thinks my
1040 ST is one of the best buys out there (just like the 800, when I
bought it many many years ago)...And I'm getting a little worried. Are
all you guys gonna give up on Atari, and I'll be stuck with a dead machine?
Is anyone in any decent PR/administrative position at Atari LISTENING
to us? Whaddabout Jack tramiel, the man who nobody ever gets to see in
person? DOES HE EVEN CARE???

  (Okay, I might be going overboard, but I'm interested)

						--R.J.
						B-\


C'mon, if you've got something to say, let's get it out into the open...


______________________________________________________________________________
Bitnet: rjung@sal124.usc.edu              "Who needs an Amiga?"    = == =    
                                                                   = == =    
                  Power WithOUT the Price                          = == =    
                                                               ===== == =====
   Just because it's 8-bits doesn't make it obsolete.          ====  ==  ====