Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!ljdickey
From: ljdickey@water.waterloo.edu (Lee Dickey)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Bad (but ANY) placing of Atari ST binaries
Message-ID: <1432@water.waterloo.edu>
Date: 24 Feb 88 17:20:55 GMT
References: <386@csvax.liv.ac.uk> <4460@eagle.ukc.ac.uk> <23660@yale-celray.yale.UUCP>
Reply-To: ljdickey@water.waterloo.edu (Lee Dickey)
Organization: U. of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 24

In article <23660@yale-celray.yale.UUCP> Ram-Ashwin@cs.yale.edu (Ashwin Ram) writes:
>In article <4460@eagle.ukc.ac.uk>, jbww@eagle (J.B.W.Webber) writes:
>> Surely ANY posting of binaries and source is better than none.
>
>Yes!
>
>> Yes, the sources and binary groups are the right place, but I think the 
>> time has now come to post here, rather than nowhere.
>
>If the bottleneck is in moderation, why not just make comp.binaries.atari.st
>unmoderated and post binaries there?  I agree with Richard Lloyd that one
>shouldn't need to sift through comp.sys.atari.st just to find programs that one
>wants.  Surely posting unmoderated binaries to comp.binaries.atari.st is better
>than posting unmoderated binaries to comp.sys.atari.st!
>

I agree.


-- 
 L. J. Dickey, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Waterloo.
	ljdickey@water.waterloo.edu
	ljdickey@watdcs.BITNET
	ljdickey@water.UUCP	...!uunet!water!ljdickey