Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!spdcc!kaos!romkey
From: romkey@kaos.UUCP (John Romkey)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: TurboC vs QuickC vs MS C/v5.0
Message-ID: <671@kaos.UUCP>
Date: 22 Feb 88 19:23:32 GMT
References: <788@imsvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: romkey@kaos.UUCP (John Romkey)
Organization: Chaos; Somerville, MA
Lines: 18
Keywords: Tech Journal comparison

In article <788@imsvax.UUCP> bob@imsvax.UUCP (Bob Burch) writes:
>          TurboC generally  checked out  as having  more features than
>     MC5, one more memory model, inline code, graphics  support (which
>     QuickC has  but 5.0  apparently doesn't),  and low-level keyboard
> support
>
>     Ted Holden
>     HT Enterprises


Well, MSC 5.0 does have the graphics support. I've used it with the 5.0
compiler (as opposed to QuickC which I didn't even bother to install)
It just doesn't always work quite right....
-- 
			- john romkey
		...harvard!spdcc!kaos!romkey
		       romkey@kaos.uucp
		    romkey@xx.lcs.mit.edu