Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!oliveb!intelca!mipos3!td2cad!cpocd2!rod
From: rod@cpocd2.UUCP (Rod Rebello)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Procomm + not that great
Message-ID: <1152@cpocd2.UUCP>
Date: 1 Mar 88 15:38:15 GMT
References: <36300012@iuvax> <328@dsinc.UUCP>
Reply-To: rod@cpocd2.UUCP (Rod Rebello)
Organization: Intel Corp., ASIC Systems Operation, Chandler, AZ
Lines: 8

In article <328@dsinc.UUCP> syd@dsinc.UUCP (Syd Weinstein) writes:
...
>I didnt use Procomm 2.4 because it could not keep up with  the screen
>(speed not lost data), and I guess I wont use PCPlus either.  BTW:
>Crosstalk works fine and can update the display.
>-- 

I noticed the same problem.  I am using Smart-Term 220 which keeps up
with the speed. I also do not want to give up VT220 emulation.