Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!decvax!ucbvax!hplabs!hpda!hpcupt1!hpindda!atchison
From: atchison@hpindda.HP.COM (Lee Atchison)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Re: Pascal on Mac
Message-ID: <6500019@hpindda.HP.COM>
Date: 16 Feb 88 20:38:15 GMT
References: <4860004@hpiacla.HP.COM>
Organization: HP Information Networks, Cupertino, CA
Lines: 18

/ hpindda:comp.sys.mac / drc@dbase.UUCP (Dennis Cohen) / 11:44 am  Feb 13, 1988 /
>comes out way ahead because you don't need to deal with that (expletive-deleted)
>editor in LSP.

I've heard this comment a number of times.  Having only used Turbo Pascal,
(which also has an integrated editor), what is wrong with the LSP editor?
Is it worse than the TP editor, or simply worse then super-fancy, lots-of-
money, hi-tech editors?

I happen to like the Turbo Pascal editor, is the LSP editor as good as/worse
than/better than this?

			-lee

----
Lee Atchison
Hewlett Packard, Information Networks Division
atchison%hpindda@hplabs.hp.com