Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!cmcl2!esquire!sbb From: sbb@esquire.UUCP (Stephen B. Baumgarten) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: A Few Good Rumors... Keywords: A/UX Unix FullWriter Message-ID: <330@esquire.UUCP> Date: 18 Feb 88 04:32:55 GMT References: <1406@csib.csi.UUCP> <1575@uhccux.UUCP> Reply-To: sbb@esquire.UUCP (Stephen B. Baumgarten) Organization: DP&W, New York, NY Lines: 28 In article <1575@uhccux.UUCP> uhccux!medix!martin (Brian K. Martin, M.D.) writes: >I've heard rumors of a 68030 workstation from Apollo priced under $5,000, due >out some time this year. Considering that Apollo supports BSD4.3, System V.3, >X windows, NFS, a sophisticated user interface management system that you can >use to build mac-like interfaces, network computing (an implementation of >course-grained parallel computing using workstations on the network as parallel >processors), and that Apollo supports an AT bus (so that you can add cheap >peripherals) and bundles in your choice of an Ethernet or token ring board, >I wonder if Apple will be forced to drop their Mac II prices. Or would people >be willing to pay a premium just because it's a Macintosh? That's exactly it. Remember, your Mac II running A/UX can also run real live useful applications as well (not that Unix isn't useful, but...). The Apollo, on the other hand, runs what in the way of software? I don't know, but it sure ain't as good as Illustrator, PageMaker, etc., etc. And please, no flames from the TeX/troff junkies... :-) To paraphrase Mr. Oster, "A Mac II makes a poor Apollo, and an Apollo makes a poor Mac II." By the way, the only "sophisticated user interface management system" I've seen running on an Apollo (or a Sun for that matter) looks suspiciously like multiple color windows with lots of scrolling text in them. Whoopee! :-) -- Steve Baumgarten | "New York... when civilization falls apart, Davis Polk & Wardwell | remember, we were way ahead of you." ...!cmcl2!esquire!sbb | - David Letterman