Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!cmcl2!husc6!think!ames!mailrus!umix!uunet!mcvax!enea!tut!santra!jmunkki
From: jmunkki@santra.UUCP (Juri Munkki)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: LSP status?
Message-ID: <10526@santra.UUCP>
Date: 19 Feb 88 18:07:05 GMT
References: <10723@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU> <11540134@hpsmtc1.HP.COM>
Reply-To: jmunkki@santra.UUCP (Juri Munkki)
Followup-To: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland
Lines: 18

In article <11540134@hpsmtc1.HP.COM> dlw@hpsmtc1.HP.COM (David Williams) writes:
>							I can hardly wait 
>for a symbolic debugger in LS C in the way LS Pascal provides. 
				 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
While the LS Pascal debugger is famous, I do not find myself using Pascal for
my development. The problem is that the LS-P environment isn't after all
equal to the real environment that a program runs in. LS C comes much closer
to the normal mac program environment (Of course there's the extra resource
file and a lot of extra resources).

I'm happy that LS C will have symbolic debugging, but I also hope that the
old way of developing programs will be available. I'd be quite satisfied if
it had a "no-symbol-debug-run" option as an extra. (I don't want to build
the program in order to do this.)

Juri Munkki
jmunkki@fingate.bitnet
jmunkki@santra.hut.fi