Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga:14630 comp.sys.misc:1173 comp.sys.ibm.pc:12061 comp.sys.mac:12856 comp.sys.atari.st:7634 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!rochester!bbn!husc6!ut-sally!im4u!vixen!joe From: joe@vixen.uucp (Joe Hitchens) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Copyrighting Keywords: legal Message-ID: <188@vixen.uucp> Date: 21 Feb 88 22:06:43 GMT References: <4815@ihlpg.ATT.COM> <3343@killer.UUCP> <2608@gryphon.CTS.COM> <333@esquire.UUCP> <22977@brunix.UUCP> Reply-To: joe@vixen.UUCP (Joe Hitchens) Organization: My House, Austin TX Lines: 34 In article <22977@brunix.UUCP> cs224065@brap0a94.UUCP (Nicholas Thompson) writes: >Don't bet on it...as I recall from the booklet on corporate security >they gave me when I first went to work, the only ABSOLUTE way to >secure the copyright on the document is with the symbol-which-is- >usually-approximated-by-(c). You know, the small letter c with the >circle around it. The c with parentheses doesn't cut it, neither >does "Copyright (c) 1988 by Nick Thompson. All Rights Reserved." >Of course it doesn't hurt to put that in, and it will certainly >give you some protection, but apparently the letter of the law says >that you need the little symbol that isn't in the ASCII character >set. So how do you protect your source code? Well, all the stuff >mentioned above counts for something, I hope... > I sent for copyright info booklets from the government 1 or maybe 2 years ago. It said thus: Copyright 1988 Joe Hitchens All Rights Reserved (is correct) Copr. 1988 Joe Hitchens All Rights Reserved (is correct) (c) 1988 Joe Hitchens All Rights Reserved (where the "(c)" is actually a small c in a circle is correct) (c) 1988 Joe Hitchens All Rights Reserved (where the "(c)" is a c in 2 parenthesis is NOT correct) In my case, I have always gone with the: Copyright 1988 Joe Hitchens All Rights Reserved It seems the most official looking. NOTE: Despite all the visible copyright messages in this text, I would like to make it clear that this text is actually NOT copyrighted but, but rather just a discussion of copyrighting practices. (In case anyone has a weak heart.) :-) It is actually in the Public Domain. j.h.