Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga:14831 comp.sys.misc:1217 comp.sys.ibm.pc:12269 comp.sys.mac:13058 comp.sys.atari.st:7734 Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!mit-eddie!killer!dcs!wnp From: wnp@dcs.UUCP (Wolf N. Paul) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: Copyright notices (was: Shareware? Hah!) Message-ID: <28@dcs.UUCP> Date: 23 Feb 88 03:30:50 GMT References: <4815@ihlpg.ATT.COM> <3343@killer.UUCP> <2608@gryphon.CTS.COM> <333@esquire.UUCP> <22977@brunix.UUCP> <21023@bbn.COM> <2069@polya.STANFORD.EDU> Reply-To: wnp@dcs.UUCP (Wolf N. Paul) Organization: DCS, Dallas, Texas Lines: 29 In article <2069@polya.STANFORD.EDU> rwilson@polya.UUCP (Randy Wilson) writes: >It may not be standard ASCII, but on the Mac, option-g gives a copyright >sign in most fonts. Wouldn't this do the job? It would do the job IF and ONLY IF you are sure that the document which you wish to protect by copyright will be displayed ONLY on another MAC or some other computer using the same code-to-character mapping for non-standard characters. Since it is non-standard, it will not even look remotely like a "c in a circle" on most terminals/printers, and thus would not "do the job". One interesting question is this, however: As has been stated, a "c in parentheses" is not a valid legal substitute for a "c in a circle". Thus, " (c) 1987 by John Doe " is not a valid copyright notice. However, since the notation "Copyright 1986 by John Doe" is valid, does the presence of "c in parentheses" between the word "Copyright" and the year REALLY invalidate the copyright notice? After all, all that is required (the word "Copyright" and the year) IS PRESENT, there's just a bit extra. Anyone care to comment? -- Wolf N. Paul Phone: (214) 306-9101 (h) (214) 404-8077 (w) 3387 Sam Rayburn Run UUCP: ihnp4!killer!{dcs, doulos}!wnp Carrollton, TX 75007 INTERNET: wnp@dcs.UUCP ESL: 62832882 Pat Robertson does NOT speak for all evangelical Christians--not for me, anyway!