Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!elroy!cit-vax!oberon!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!bbn!rochester!PT.CS.CMU.EDU!andrew.cmu.edu!rs4u+ From: rs4u+@andrew.cmu.edu (Richard Siegel) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: LightSpeed C, and C++ Message-ID: Date: 24 Feb 88 13:46:05 GMT Organization: Carnegie Mellon University Lines: 22 In-Reply-To: <6815@drutx.ATT.COM> One of the most common requests I heard while I was at THINK was a request for a C++ (or some object-oriented C) implementation in LightspeedC. >I've heard several ways that some influential person(s) at LightSpeed >may not feel a reason to support C++. I won't say that THINK's absolutely positively never ever going to do an object-oriented C for LightspeedC. In fact, I don't know anyone who will. What is much harder to say is *when*. --Rich =================================================================== Richard Siegel THINK Technologies, QA Technician (on leave) I'm not physically at THINK, so my information may be out of date. Be forewarned. Arpa: rs4u@andrew.cmu.edu UUCP: {decvax,ucbvax,sun}!andrew.cmu.edu!rs4u ==================================================================