Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!labrea!aurora!amelia!ames!hao!gatech!purdue!i.cc.purdue.edu!j.cc.purdue.edu!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!uxe.cso.uiuc.edu!hirchert
From: hirchert@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Call for votes: comp.binaries.hyper
Message-ID: <46100096@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 25 Feb 88 23:16:00 GMT
References: <454@stech.UUCP>
Lines: 8
Nf-ID: #R:stech.UUCP:454:uxe.cso.uiuc.edu:46100096:000:447
Nf-From: uxe.cso.uiuc.edu!hirchert    Feb 25 17:16:00 1988


On the issue of creating a new group comp.binaries.hypercard, is there some
reason why it should not be called comp.binaries.mac.hypercard, just as we
have comp.sys.mac and comp.sys.mac.hypercard?  Comp.binaries.mac.hypercard
would be more convenient to me personally and appears to me to be more
consistent with the rest of the naming stucture for Mac-related newsgroups.

Kurt W. Hirchert         National Center for Supercomputing Applications