Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bbn!uwmcsd1!ig!agate!ucbvax!ulysses!hector!ekrell
From: ekrell@hector.UUCP (Eduardo Krell)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: layers vs SunView (was: Will X Windows be standard part...)
Message-ID: <10057@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com>
Date: 12 Feb 88 15:06:53 GMT
References: <14140@pyramid.pyramid.com> <5400018@snail> <7223@brl-smoke.ARPA> <17930@topaz.rutgers.edu> <7239@brl-smoke.ARPA> <10040@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com> <7248@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Sender: netnews@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com
Reply-To: ekrell@hector (Eduardo Krell)
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Murray Hill
Lines: 17

In article <7248@brl-smoke.ARPA> gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>) writes:

>That sounds much better, but is that software the same as the general public
>gets (say, with their 3B2+630), or is it more of the nifty Bell Labs internal
>stuff that nobody else can get hold of?

I'm using the standard System V layers. The kernel on the 3B2 is hacked,
but I didn't touch anything that has to do with layers.

>Is the System V layers multiplexing converted to STREAMS yet?  Does it work
>as well as on Ninth Edition UNIX?

I wish... it still uses the XT device driver.
    
    Eduardo Krell                   AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ

    UUCP: {ihnp4,ucbvax}!ulysses!ekrell		ARPA: ekrell%ulysses@att.arpa