Xref: utzoo comp.unix.questions:5716 comp.mail.uucp:1025 Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!amdcad!ames!hao!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!homxb!hropus!ki4pv!codas!killer!dcs!wnp From: wnp@dcs.UUCP (Wolf N. Paul) Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,comp.mail.uucp Subject: Re: Packet size & number of windows in UUCP Message-ID: <19@dcs.UUCP> Date: 18 Feb 88 06:24:21 GMT References: <567@acornrc.UUCP> <13668@pyramid.pyramid.com> <788@vixie.UUCP> <398@cogen.UUCP> <157@istop.ist.CO.UK> Reply-To: wnp@dcs.UUCP (Wolf N. Paul) Organization: DCS, Dallas, Texas Lines: 21 Keywords: UUCP, packets, windows, tweaks, performance In article <157@istop.ist.CO.UK> neil@ist.CO.UK (Neil Todd) writes: >OK, not a UKC comment but:- UKUUCP is not written by UKC, is derives >for HB (I believe), much of the dirty work was done by >Lee McLoughlin currently at Imperial College >in London. The majority of sites in the UK use it. Zillions of bug >fixes, plus improved structure of L.sys file, additional protocols >(currently g,f and t I think), runs nicely over X25 lines. > >New release is currently on the cards, as for getting it that is >possibly a problem is it is NOT PD. If getting it is a problem, and it is not PD, how come the majority of sites in UK use it? Are the majority of sites in UK source licenced? If not, how do they get it? A definitive and authoritative comment from UKC would still be welcome! -- Wolf N. Paul Phone: (214) 306-9101 (h) (214) 404-8077 (w) 3387 Sam Rayburn Run UUCP: ihnp4!killer!{dcs, doulos}!wnp Carrollton, TX 75007 INTERNET: wnp@dcs.UUCP ESL: 62832882 Pat Robertson does NOT speak for all evangelical Christians--not for me, anyway!