Xref: utzoo comp.unix.questions:5809 comp.mail.uucp:1042
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!pyramid!csg
From: csg@pyramid.pyramid.com (Carl S. Gutekunst)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: UNIX Contracts (Was: Packet size & number of windows in UUCP)
Message-ID: <15542@pyramid.pyramid.com>
Date: 25 Feb 88 17:54:59 GMT
References: <15322@pyramid.pyramid.com> <4684@mcdchg.UUCP> <20522@amdcad.AMD.COM>
Organization: Pyramid Technology Corp., Mountain View, CA
Lines: 17

In article <15322@pyramid.pyramid.com> I said:
>>> And any site that has a source license can compile it for a neighboring
>>> site that has only a binary license, and give them the binary.

And Ron and Phil replied:
>>I think that this should be checked before being acted upon....

>I have asked AT&T about this also and Ron is correct.... _you_ must license a
>machine before _you_ put any AT&T Unix code on it, whether source or binary,
>it must be licensed appropriately.

I've read UNIX contracts, and I should know better. You are both correct. No
one may supply licensed UNIX software to another site without the appropriate
redistribution license *and* relicensing of the destination machine.

My apologies for the error.

<csg>