Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!nrl-cmf!ukma!psuvm.bitnet!cunyvm.bitnet!wgrcu From: WGRCU@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (Bill Rubin) Newsgroups: news.admin Subject: Re: Top 25 News Groups for the last 2 weeks (from talk.bizarre) Message-ID: <1156WGRCU@CUNYVM> Date: 24 Feb 88 00:01:55 GMT References: <7080@uunet.UU.NET> <1918@mind.UUCP> Organization: The City University of New York - New York, NY Lines: 36 DISCLAIMER: Author bears full responsibility for contents of this article In going thru some files on system's news disk, trying to find room for new news because the disk had filled up, I found this dribble in talk.bizarre: In article <1918@mind.UUCP>, greg@mind.UUCP (greg Nowak) says: > >In article <7080@uunet.UU.NET> newsstats@uunet.UU.NET writes: > > No. of $ Cost % of Cumulative > Rank Kbytes Articles per Site Total % of Total Group (Articles/contributor) > 1 1175.9 696 36.75 3.5% 3.5% comp.sys.ibm.pc (1.7) > 2 1066.7 948 33.33 3.1% 6.6% soc.singles (3.0) > 3 1038.4 698 32.45 3.1% 9.7% soc.women (2.9) > 4 1035.2 1263 32.35 3.1% 12.7% talk.bizarre (6.2) > > >Congratulations to ALL for a FABULOUS effort. I believe 4th is the >highest we have EVER placed. But WORK at it, damnit! 31 more KB and we >would have beaten SOC.SINGLES! > >I did my part. 95 KB. Now you do yours. > >-- > greg Now, I have never read talk.bizarre, and I know there are some sites which do not carry the talk. groups, but we have decided not to do this here, because we feel that it is important that we carry as much as possible. But when I see this kind of garbage, posted not once but three times, I have to wonder if we are making the correct decision. I would ask if people realize the overhead involved in each message they post, but the obvious answer in this case is that they could care less. At minimum, talk.bizarre postings are going to get a much shorter life at my site. ------- Bill Rubin City University of New York 212/903-3676 WGRCU@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU