Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!hao!noao!mcdsun!mcdchg!falkor!heiby From: heiby@falkor.UUCP (Ron Heiby) Newsgroups: news.admin Subject: Re: Top 25 News Groups for the last 2 weeks (from talk.bizarre) Message-ID: <134@falkor.UUCP> Date: 25 Feb 88 13:46:33 GMT References: <7080@uunet.UU.NET> <1918@mind.UUCP> <1156WGRCU@CUNYVM> <8272@eddie.MIT.EDU> Reply-To: heiby@mcdchg.UUCP (Ron Heiby) Organization: Luck Dragons, Magic, & Friends Lines: 29 Bill Wisner (wisner@eddie.MIT.EDU) writes: | (article <7080@uunet.UU.NET>, newsstats@uunet.UU.NET) | >> No. of $ Cost % of Cumulative | >> Rank Kbytes Articles per Site Total % of Total Group | >> 1 1175.9 696 36.75 3.5% 3.5% comp.sys.ibm.pc (1.7) | >> 2 1066.7 948 33.33 3.1% 6.6% soc.singles (3.0) | >> 3 1038.4 698 32.45 3.1% 9.7% soc.women (2.9) | >> 4 1035.2 1263 32.35 3.1% 12.7% talk.bizarre (6.2) | | I would even ask if Mr. Rubin has the tiniest shred of a sense of humor. As I don't know Mr. Rubin, I won't comment directly on his sense of humor, but I suspect that it is much like that of most people who are responsible for the use of machine resources. Most people in such a position probably would find a talk.bizarre that had a "% of Total" somewhere below 1.0% to be at least mildly humorous. Most people in such a position probably find the current talk.bizarre, with a 3.1% value to be quite sad. Bill suggests later in his article that if a site doesn't like talk.bizarre, then they can stop taking it. This is quite true. I find it very odd that someone would want to encourage the kind of behaviour that will lead to increasing numbers of administrators taking exactly that action. [Note: This article is not going to talk.bizarre, because I don't support the "talk" groups. Never did. Never will. It is also not going to alt.flame, because I don't support institutionalized flaming on the net. The groups aren't here, so I can't post to them.] -- Ron Heiby, heiby@mcdchg.UUCP Moderator: comp.newprod & comp.unix "Intel architectures build character."