Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!gatech!hao!noao!mcdsun!nud!anasaz!john
From: john@anasaz.UUCP (John Moore)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics
Subject: Re: X-Ray countermeasures (was Robocop spotted (Photo radar enforcement))
Message-ID: <656@anasaz.UUCP>
Date: 22 Feb 88 16:37:49 GMT
References: <602@anasaz.UUCP> <342@tandem.UUCP> <610@anasaz.UUCP> <1358@vaxb.calgary.UUCP> <1098@uop.edu>
Reply-To: john@anasaz.UUCP (John Moore)
Organization: Anasazi Inc, Phoenix AZ
Lines: 30

In article <1098@uop.edu> todd@uop.edu (Dr. Nethack) writes:
>Years ago this was discussed in Radio Electronics magazine.
>An engineer had cut little dipoles and mounted them on his plugs somehow.
>The result was he splattered the desired band with noise..
>At the time the article was printed, there were no laws governing
>engine noise.. is this still true?
>
>So why don't we now bring this into a discussion of noise jamming,
>and how to generate it??
AHEM!!!!
   Puleeze don't do this! Some of us use radio a lot, and we
don't wan't to listen to your spark plugs! Some of us fly airplanes,
and we REALLY don't want to have your spark plugs mess up
our nav/com equipment.
    If you insist on such foolishness (and, I admit, the attractions
are certainly there), get something that will only radiate on or
near the frequency you want to disable.
    And, remember,   if Uncle Charlie (FCC) catches you at this,
you can end up in seriously deep doo-doo (like, for example, Leavenworth)!






-- 
John Moore (NJ7E)   hao!noao!mcdsun!nud!anasaz!john
(602) 870-3330 (day or evening)
The opinions expressed here are obviously not mine, so they must be
someone else's.