Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!hao!ames!pasteur!agate!garnet!weemba
From: weemba@garnet.berkeley.edu (Obnoxious Math Grad Student)
Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech
Subject: Re: Classifying the Axiom of Choice
Message-ID: <7123@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: 22 Feb 88 22:48:51 GMT
References: <1890@mind.UUCP> <25011@linus.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: weemba@garnet.berkeley.edu (Obnoxious Math Grad Student)
Organization: Brahms Gang Posting Central
Lines: 11
In-reply-to: bwk@mitre-bedford.ARPA (Barry W. Kort)


In article <25011@linus.UUCP>, bwk@mitre-bedford (Barry W. Kort) writes:
>My choice is to classify the Axiom of Choice as synthetic and
>a posteriori.

I favor analytic a posteriori, myself.  "analytic", since all mathematical
truths are, and "a posteriori", since AC is based on our derived perceptions
of sets.

[Oh Greg, I originally missed your article, thanks to the joys of `K'.]

ucbvax!garnet!weemba	Matthew P Wiener/Brahms Gang/Berkeley CA 94720