Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!julian!deepthot!areski
From: areski@deepthot.UUCP (Areski)
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Re: Communism
Summary: Work, happiness, crippled boys and bright girls
Message-ID: <1083@deepthot.UUCP>
Date: 7 Mar 88 01:57:46 GMT
References: <2380@geac.UUCP>
Reply-To: areski@deepthot.UUCP (Areski)
Distribution: ont
Organization: UWO CS, London Canada
Lines: 26
Posted: Sun Mar  6 20:57:46 1988


 In article <2380@geac.UUCP> daveb@geac.UUCP writes:

$$ >In article <303@brambo.UUCP> morgan@brambo.UUCP (Morgan W. Jones)
$$ >writes in response to Kenneth Warkentyne:
$$ >I think that all of us agree that every human being has the right to
$$ >have an equal chance to succeed in life. 
$$ 
$$     Actually, I don't think everyone should have an equal chance to
$$ succeed.  Specifically, I don't think the nice little retarded
$$ boy next door should have the same chance to succeed as the bright
$$ girl down the block.

	I agree. Nice little retarded boys next door should be canned
at birth to provide dog feed for the pets of bright little girls down 
the block. This would have at least four advantages:

	1. It would save bucks to people who are prepared to work hard
and are happy.
	2. It would save nice little retarded boys next door an absurd life.
	3. It would provide variety in in the diet of bright-little-girls-
down-the-block's pets.
	4. It would have a desirable effect on the ecological surrounding
of people who are prepared to work hard and are happy: it is much nicer
to watch bright little girls down the block (especially in their teens),
than nice little retarded little boys next door (at any age).