Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!think!ames!eos!aurora!labrea!decwrl!ucbvax!AWIIMC11.BITNET!ADLASSNI
From: ADLASSNI@AWIIMC11.BITNET ("Adlassnig, Peter")
Newsgroups: comp.ai.digest
Subject: Question on arguments against AI
Message-ID: <8803051150.AA05897@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 5 Mar 88 12:47:41 GMT
Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 20
Approved: ailist@kl.sri.com
X-Unparsable-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 88 18:09:12 SET



Is it true that there are two main arguments against the feasibility
of AI?

1) The philosophical and cognitive science argument
   (e.g., Dreyfus, Searle)

2) The computability and complexity theory argument
   (e.g., Lucas(?))

Could someone point out some relevant literature on the second
point, please?

Thank you in advance.

Klaus-Peter Adlassnig
Department of Medical Computer Science
Garnisongasse 13
A - 1090 Vienna, Austria
email: ADLASSNI at AWIIMC11.BITNET