Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!mtune!mtuni!aaa
From: aaa@mtuni.ATT.COM (Aaron Akman)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans
Subject: Re: NFS vs RFS
Message-ID: <306@mtuni.ATT.COM>
Date: 17 Mar 88 15:20:45 GMT
References: <184@quick.COM>
Organization: AT&T ISL Middletown NJ USA
Lines: 11

From article <184@quick.COM>, by srg@quick.COM (Spencer Garrett):
> 
> Another problem with RFS is that the control structures are passed
> around in native binary (or so say the AT&T training folks), so you
> can't mount filesystems on machines with different byte orders.

Not true.  I'm running RFS between different machines with conflicting
byte order.  It works just fine.
-- 

Aaron, mtuni!aaa, 201-957-2751