Xref: utzoo comp.edu:1022 rec.humor.d:619 Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!hao!boulder!sunybcs!bingvaxu!leah!uwmcsd1!bbn!oberon!nunki.usc.edu!sal1.usc.edu!rjung From: rjung@sal1.usc.edu (Robert Jung) Newsgroups: comp.edu,rec.humor.d Subject: Grading on a curve (was Re: cruelty to undergrads) Message-ID: <503@nunki.usc.edu> Date: 16 Mar 88 19:34:20 GMT References: <18618@topaz.rutgers.edu> <706@l.cc.purdue.edu> <2527@pdn.UUCP> Sender: news@nunki.usc.edu Reply-To: rjung@sal1.usc.edu (Robert Jung) Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA Lines: 35 Summary: It's not funny any more (Okay, this probably doesn't belong in rec.humor.d anymore, but I wanted to throw my $0.02 in...) I always thought "grading on a curve" meant the following: 1. Design test. 2. Grade tests (numeric scores). 3. Get highest numeric score (call it x) 4. Work out grades as follows: 1.00x - 0.9x = A 0.89x - 0.8x = B 0.79x - 0.7x = C 0.69x - 0.6x = D anything worse = Fail This way, if the test is exceptionally hard, the student's aren't penalized. The numeric breakdown separates the chaff from the wheat, and your smart students *are* rewarded... DISCLAIMER: I am in no way, shape, or form an educator of some kind. This is just my concept of "fair grading" (HA!) --R.J. B-) P.S. Okay, a joke for all the rec.humorists out there: How do you determine the sex of a chromosome? You pull down its genes. <=====================================><=====================================> Disclaimer: These ideas are all mine! Mineminemineminemineminemineminemine! Send e-junk-mail through Bitnet to rjung@castor.usc.edu