Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!brl-adm!adm!MAILER%ALASKA.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU
From: MAILER%ALASKA.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Undelivered mail
Message-ID: <12261@brl-adm.ARPA>
Date: 12 Mar 88 05:19:24 GMT
Sender: news@brl-adm.ARPA
Lines: 39

Subject:  Re: Another \"D\" idea: RPN (and more)

[Non-Deliverable:  User does not exist or has never logged on]

Reply-To: Info-C@BRL.ARPA

Received: From UWAVM(MAILER) by ALASKA with Jnet id 6470
          for SXJVK@ALASKA; Fri, 11 Mar 88 19:45 AST
Received: by UWAVM (Mailer X1.25) id 4349; Fri, 11 Mar 88 20:44:04 PST
Date:         Tue, 8 Mar 88 16:51:00 GMT
Reply-To:     Info-C@BRL.ARPA
Sender:       Info-C List <INFO-C@NDSUVM1>
From:         justin@inmet.uucp
Subject:      Re: Another \"D\" idea: RPN (and more)
Comments: To: info-c@brl-smoke.arpa
To:           Vic Kapella <SXJVK@ALASKA>


/* Written  4:29 pm  Mar  3, 1988 by gwyn@brl-smoke.UUCP in inmet:comp.lang.c */
In article <12088@brl-adm.ARPA> TLIMONCE%DREW.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU writes:
>I think that the one thing that really detracts from C is the fact that it
>isn't RPN.  Reverse-polish-notation has a lot of benefits.  First of all,
>we'd get the support of all the HP calculator lovers, all the FORTH users,
>and compiler writers would find it easier to write compilers since RPN is
>easier to parse.

This idea isn't totally off-the-wall, but it would move the D language
away from being a revised C and toward something markedly different.
/* End of text from inmet:comp.lang.c */

God, it's finally happened. I had heard about this trend, but I couldn't
believe it. But it's really true. Nobody on the net (except in talk.bizarre)
is capable of recognizing sarcasm without a row of smileys at the end!

Come on, people, *think* about what you're reading. If we really have lost
the ability to tell what tone the article was written in, it means that
English on the net has degenerated a lot more than I thought.

                    -- Justin du Coeur