Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!brl-adm!adm!MAILER%ALASKA.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU
From: MAILER%ALASKA.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Undelivered mail
Message-ID: <12316@brl-adm.ARPA>
Date: 12 Mar 88 20:47:50 GMT
Sender: news@brl-adm.ARPA
Lines: 37

Subject:  Re: Another \"D\" idea: RPN (and more)

[Non-Deliverable:  User does not exist or has never logged on]

Reply-To: Info-C@BRL.ARPA

Received: From UWAVM(MAILER) by ALASKA with Jnet id 8271
          for SXJVK@ALASKA; Sat, 12 Mar 88 11:24 AST
Received: by UWAVM (Mailer X1.25) id 5559; Sat, 12 Mar 88 12:24:25 PST
Date:         Sun, 6 Mar 88 17:14:47 GMT
Reply-To:     Info-C@BRL.ARPA
Sender:       Info-C List <INFO-C@NDSUVM1>
From:         Gregory Conway <gregory@ritcsh.uucp>
Subject:      Re: Another \"D\" idea: RPN (and more)
Comments: To: info-c@brl-smoke.arpa
To:           Vic Kapella <SXJVK@ALASKA>

In article <12088@brl-adm.ARPA>, TLIMONCE%DREW.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU writes:
>
> Another thing that "D" should have... actually not have, is pointers. At
> least 85% of the problems discussed here on Info-C are people who have
> some problem with confusion about pointers.  Removing pointers would solve
> this whole set of problems.
>

     You seem to me to be a little hasty here.  The problem has NOTHING to do
with pointers, but rather people who do not understand pointers who use them
anyways.  Pointers are the most powerful aspect of the C programming language
and are what make it such a joy to work with.  To para-phrase, pointers
don't kill, programmers do.


--
================================================================================
Gregory Conway@Computer Science House    UUCP: ...rochester!ritcv!ritcsh!gregory
Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY
    "I got an allergy to Perrier, daylight, and responsibility", Marillion