Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!csri.toronto.EDU!sam From: sam@csri.toronto.EDU ("S. Weber") Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2 Subject: Re: (none) Message-ID: <8803090500.AA08160@csri.toronto.edu> Date: 9 Mar 88 05:00:42 GMT References: <8802102345.AA05537@qusunc.qucis.uucp> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: Info-Modula2 Distribution List Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto Lines: 21 In article <8802102345.AA05537@qusunc.qucis.uucp> you write: > >I am doing a comparative study on the design issues of Modula-2 vs. Turing +. I am currently studing the design of programming languages, and would be interested in seeing the results of your study. Would it be possible for me to get a copy of your finished paper? Thank you. Also, I was wondering why you chose to compare Turing Plus with Modula-2. It would seem to me more natural to compare Turing with Modula-2, or Turing Plus with Modula-2+, since the main features of both Turing Plus and Modula-2+ over their mundane counterparts are the additions of concurrency and exception handling. It just appears to me that you would have a broader base of comparison if you chose languages which did not have widely different features. Oh well, none of my business, I suppose. -- -Sam Weber UUCP: {ihnp4 utzoo decwrl uw-beaver}!utcsri!sam ARPA: sam@csri.toronto.edu CSNET: sam@toronto