Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!mit-eddie!killer!tness1!tness7!mechjgh
From: mechjgh@tness7.UUCP (Greg Hackney )
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: Rerouting of explicit paths
Message-ID: <9@tness7.UUCP>
Date: 6 Mar 88 20:54:13 GMT
References: <327@vsi1.UUCP>
Reply-To: mechjgh@tness1.UUCP (Greg Hackney)
Organization: Southwestern Bell
Lines: 11
Summary: et tu

In article <327@vsi1.UUCP> lmb@vsi1.UUCP (Larry Blair) writes:

>I am not in favor of rerouting a local user's explicit path
>As far as rerouting mail sent through your site goes, this should be considered
>to be a no-no subject to immediate de-netting!
>(since I found out that
>rutgers is rerouting, I changed their map entry to show all their connections
>as DEAD).

Ah. So YOU are rerouting around Rutgers because you think it's
the best way to treat mail. By your terms, you should be de-netted.