Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!think!ames!oliveb!pyramid!voder!tolerant!vsi1!lmb
From: lmb@vsi1.UUCP (Larry Blair)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: Rerouting of explicit paths
Message-ID: <347@vsi1.UUCP>
Date: 7 Mar 88 18:31:05 GMT
References: <327@vsi1.UUCP> <9@tness7.UUCP>
Reply-To: lmb@vsi1.UUCP (Larry Blair)
Organization: VICOM Systems Inc., San Jose, CA
Lines: 23

In article <9@tness7.UUCP> mechjgh@tness1.UUCP (Greg Hackney) writes:
%In article <327@vsi1.UUCP> lmb@vsi1.UUCP (Larry Blair) writes:
%
%>I am not in favor of rerouting a local user's explicit path
%>As far as rerouting mail sent through your site goes, this should be considered
%>to be a no-no subject to immediate de-netting!
%>(since I found out that
%>rutgers is rerouting, I changed their map entry to show all their connections
%>as DEAD).
%
%Ah. So YOU are rerouting around Rutgers because you think it's
%the best way to treat mail. By your terms, you should be de-netted.

You missed my point!  I am NOT rerouting other sites mail.  I am merely
helping onsite users who let their mail be autorouted avoid a site
that will send the mail to who-knows-where.

----
*   *   O     Larry Blair
  *   *   O   VICOM Systems Inc.     sun!pyramid----\
    *   *   O 2520 Junction Ave.     uunet!ubvax----->!vsi1!lmb
  *   *   O   San Jose, CA  95134    ucbvax!tolerant/
*   *   O     +1-408-432-8660