Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!mailrus!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!SCOTTY.DCCS.UPENN.EDU!hagan
From: hagan@SCOTTY.DCCS.UPENN.EDU (John Dotts Hagan)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: TCP/IP Terminal Servers
Message-ID: <8802292140.AA14355@scotty.dccs.upenn.edu>
Date: 29 Feb 88 21:40:22 GMT
References: <8802232144.AA29803@newton.ncsa.uiuc.edu>
Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 13

I strongly recommend paying special attention to the Encore annex terminal
servers and cisco's terminal server.  Both are quality products that implement
many of the newest and best features.

Penn has adopted the annex as our terminal server of choice, but we made the
decision before the cisco product had added a bunch of new features (like
a good reverse terminal service).

I would also go on record as saying the Bridge products we evaulated about
12 months ago were not good at all.  However, a new major release of software
is out and I have no experience with it.

--Kid.