Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!uwvax!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!inuxc!iuvax!pur-ee!j.cc.purdue.edu!i.cc.purdue.edu!h.cc.purdue.edu!s.cc.purdue.edu!ain
From: ain@s.cc.purdue.edu (Patrick White)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Feeping Creaturism
Message-ID: <2403@s.cc.purdue.edu>
Date: 3 Mar 88 16:06:52 GMT
References: <655@nuchat.UUCP> <657@sandino.quintus.UUCP> <367@sas.UUCP> <722@sandino.quintus.UUCP>
Reply-To: ain@s.cc.purdue.edu.UUCP (Patrick White)
Organization: PUCC Land, USA
Lines: 17

In article <722@sandino.quintus.UUCP> pds@quintus.UUCP (Peter Schachte) writes:
>In article <367@sas.UUCP>, bts@sas.UUCP (Brian T. Schellenberger) writes:
>> [it has been suggested that incremental compiles share information
>> so only the changed stuff need be re-compiled]

   Sounds good to me Peter, why don't you write it..
   
   Oh, and be sure to include lots of ram with the package because it will
eat lots of ram... you know.. with enough ram I could rule the wo... scratch
that.. wrong saying...     with enough ram, I could keep everything in ram,
and with MANX's precompiled symbol tables, I wouldn't need to read in 200
lines of includes for a 10 line function...
   You know, I bet this would be *almost* as fast as your idea Peter.

-- Pat White
UUCP: k.cc.purdue.edu!ain  BITNET: PATWHITE@PURCCVM   PHONE: (317) 743-8421
U.S.  Mail:  320 Brown St. apt. 406,    West Lafayette, IN 47906