Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!bbn!rochester!PT.CS.CMU.EDU!andrew.cmu.edu!dg2l+
From: dg2l+@andrew.cmu.edu (Douglas Phillip Ghormley)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Oops, I meant '286
Message-ID: <kWB0kJy00XoAp4Y07d@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: 8 Mar 88 14:58:29 GMT
Organization: Carnegie Mellon University
Lines: 12


Sorry, not the '386 Bridge Board, the '286 (I hope too hard sometimes).

I'm in the process of buying a 2000 and I'd like to have the IBM 
compatibility, but if the AT Bridge board is going to be out sometime soon 
(i.e. this summer), then I'll hold off for it.  Any word, either official or 
otherwise?

Thanks,
-Doug
 (dg2l+@andrew.cmu.edu)

[This space left unintentionally blank.]