Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!amdahl!acs
From: acs@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com (Tony Sumrall)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: NOISYREQ anomaly
Message-ID: <24895@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com>
Date: 18 Mar 88 02:06:02 GMT
References: <23669@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> <24731@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> <571@myrias.UUCP>
Reply-To: acs@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com (Tony Sumrall)
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA
Lines: 14
Keywords: VT100 NOISYREQ window close requester
Summary: But NOISYREQ should be *noisy*

In article <571@myrias.UUCP> cg@myriasa.UUCP (Chris Gray) writes:
>Tony Sumrall (acs@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com) suggests that he wants to be able
>to see a window-close event when a requester in that window is active.
>I so NO to this!! One of the points behind requesters is that they must be
>handled before any other events for the window are.

This conflicts with the definition of NOISYREQ, doesn't it?  I can get key
press events from the window while the requester is up...I can even get
window active messages...why can't I get a CLOSEWINDOW?
-- 
Tony Sumrall acs@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com <=> amdahl!acs

[ Opinions expressed herein are the author's and should not be construed
  to reflect the views of Amdahl Corp. ]