Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!hao!cgdra.ucar.edu!hangetsu
From: hangetsu@cgdra.ucar.edu (Dan Baldwin)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: Re: APPLE2-L file directory
Message-ID: <1212@hao.ucar.edu>
Date: 8 Mar 88 17:24:21 GMT
References: <8803051834.aa19828@SMOKE.BRL.ARPA>
Sender: news@hao.ucar.edu
Reply-To: hangetsu@cgdra.ucar.edu (Dan Baldwin)
Organization: Climate and Global Dynamics Div., NCAR, Boulder, CO
Lines: 16


   There is so much confusion regarding APPLE2-L,  how do you use it, who can
recieve it, etc. There seem to be many people out there interested in a binaries
group. Can we take the vote again ? What would it take ? I joined this group
after the vote was taken so I dont kwnow why it was nixed. Apathy seems to be
the reason that I hear the most. To the people who are apathetic I make this
plea : Please consider the people who cannot effectivly use APPLE2-L, if 
apathy is your only reason to vote against the binaries group, then teh
fact that many people who can not use APPLE2-L could use a binaries group
should steer you towards a positive response. It is interesting that
in the sysytems of groups to which I can subscribe, every computer
type (IBM,MAC<AMIGA,ATARI,etc) has a binaries group. Given the bent of
most APPLE2 users it is very surprising that we dont have one.
   LETS HAVE ANOTHER VOTE ! DO WE NEED TO VOTE TO SEE IF WE NEED ANOTHER
VOTE ? What would it take for another vote ?
             THANKS,
           DAN BALDWIN