Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bbn!uwmcsd1!marque!gryphon!crash!mkao
From: mkao@crash.cts.com (Mike Kao)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: Re: Misc.
Message-ID: <2692@crash.cts.com>
Date: 16 Mar 88 23:33:17 GMT
References: <8803010456.aa29533@SMOKE.BRL.ARPA> <7441@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <2675@crash.cts.com> <7650@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Reply-To: mkao@crash.CTS.COM (Mike Kao)
Organization: Crash TS, El Cajon, CA
Lines: 20
Keywords: crack interrupt


> It's not taboo.

Yet you treat it as such in your talk. Why is this subject not "appropriate"
to a general Apple users' forum? I believe that any topic that is legal is
germane. I think too many people equate talk of deprotection to piracy. The
two are distinct. Isn't there a clause somewhere grants people the right to
make archival copies of their software? If so, then why can't people discuss
HOW to do this out in the open, instead of being referred to some "underground"
magazine?

-- 

To insure my reception of any replies, please respond via e-mail. Thanks!

                                                                  -- Mike Kao

UUCP: {cbosgd, hplabs!hp-sdd, sdcsvax, nosc}!crash!pnet01!mkao
ARPA: crash!pnet01!mkao@nosc.mil
INET: mkao@pnet01.CTS.COM