Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!oberon!nunki.usc.edu!castor.usc.edu!rjung From: rjung@castor.usc.edu (Robert Jung) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: Magazine programs Message-ID: <403@nunki.usc.edu> Date: 5 Mar 88 19:58:13 GMT References: <7281@mhuxu.UUCP" <3548@cup.portal.com> <1200@pasteur.Berkeley.Edu> <393@nunki.usc.edu> <1237@pasteur.Berkeley.Edu> Sender: news@nunki.usc.edu Reply-To: rjung@castor.usc.edu (Robert Jung) Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA Lines: 30 In article <1237@pasteur.Berkeley.Edu> seitz@cory.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP (Matthew Eric Seitz) writes: >In article <393@nunki.usc.edu" I wrote: >" While we're on the subject of type-in magazines... >" Does anyone know why magazines make a "big deal" (relatively speaking) about >"how their type-in programs cannot be sent around (on bulletin boards, for >"instance)? > > It is indeed because of copyright. If everyone could freely distribute >programs from magazines, the incentive to purchase the magazine would be >reduced. It's really no different from any other kind of software piracy. Does this mean that the magazine publishers think people buy their publications SOLELY for the type-in programs? I always bought an issue of (fill in your favorite magazine here) for the articles/tutorials in it. Type-in games and programs are merely icing on the cake. Besides, has any magazine ever persecuted anyone for uploading a type-in program to a BBS, or for distributing copies of a type-in program? Seems like a really minor point to me... --R.J. B-) ______________________________________________________________________________ Bitnet: rjung@castor.usc.edu "Who needs an Amiga?" = == = = == = Power WithOUT the Price = == = ===== == ===== Just because it's 8-bits doesn't make it obsolete. ==== == ====