Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!mcvax!unido!tub!tmpmbx!netmbx!hase
From: hase@netmbx.UUCP (Hartmut Semken)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Micro RTX Description (discussion, predictions)
Message-ID: <1504@netmbx.UUCP>
Date: 10 Mar 88 20:39:56 GMT
References: <169@bdt.UUCP> <4518@watdcsu.waterloo.edu>
Reply-To: hase@netmbx.UUCP (Hartmut Semken)
Organization: netmbx Public Access Unix, Berlin
Lines: 24
Keywords: RTX MULTITASKING

In article <4518@watdcsu.waterloo.edu> ttims@watdcsu.waterloo.edu (Tracy Tims) writes:
>Your RTX system sounds really, really nice.  (I wrote my own mini message

It is, I think. David: is MTCShell based on RTX in some way?
A friend of mine is using MTC Shell and likes it.
>	Why isn't Atari licensing it from you and distributing it
>	with all their machines?
I don't know. I would like it.
I would really like it if it would be komfortable.
Komforteble is something when you can switch it off.

>
>It sounds like a better software system than they will ever be able to design
>and distribute.  Are they holding out because they think they can do better?
I think, they could do better; But software development is expensive in
both, time and money.
Support of software is even more expensive.

Right?
hase
-- 
Hartmut Semken, Berlin (West) (*east of West-Germany :-)
hase@netmbx.UUCP
I think, you may be right in what I think you're thinking. (Douglas Adams)