Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sri-spam!ames!hao!gatech!udel!princeton!mccc!pjh
From: pjh@mccc.UUCP (Peter J. Holsberg)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att
Subject: Re: Development Set 3.5 vs. 3.51
Message-ID: <230@mccc.UUCP>
Date: 22 Feb 88 01:57:32 GMT
References: <1730@rtech.UUCP>
Reply-To: pjh@mccc.UUCP (Peter J. Holsberg)
Organization: The College on the Other Side of US Route 1
Lines: 24

In article <1730@rtech.UUCP> rog@rtech.UUCP (Roger Taranto) writes:
|
|When I upgraded my machine from OS 3.5 to 3.51, the installation
|instructions said not to use the 3.5 Development set.  Since I wasn't
|interested in paying any more money, I kept the 3.5 Development Set.
|
|So, my questions are: what, if anything, will go wrong if I continue
|to use the 3.5 Development Set with the 3.51 OS?  Second, how much
|is the upgrade to the 3.51 DS, and how difficult is it to get.
|
|-Roger
|{mtxinu,ptsfa,amdahl,sun}!rtech!rog


Can't answer the second question, Roger, but I've been using 3.5
development set on 3.51 machines for a couple of months.  The only
problem was loading the advanced editors--several of the 3.5 AE disks
couldn't be read.

-- 
Peter Holsberg                  UUCP: {rutgers!}princeton!mccc!pjh
Technology Division             CompuServe: 70240,334
Mercer College                  GEnie: PJHOLSBERG
Trenton, NJ 08690               Voice: 1-609-586-4800