Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!mit-eddie!ll-xn!ames!ucsd!sdcsvax!ucsdhub!hp-sdd!hplabs!hpcea!hpnmd!hpsrli!waynec
From: waynec@hpsrli.HP.COM (Wayne Cannon)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: NEC Multisync vs. NEC Multisync Plus
Message-ID: <340007@hpsrli.HP.COM>
Date: 11 Mar 88 16:23:30 GMT
References: <7597@cisunx.UUCP>
Organization: HP Network Measurements Div, Santa Rosa, CA
Lines: 9

Although several reviewers have tested the Multisync Plus at 1024x768,
it is actually spec'd at somewhat less than that, 960x720.  HOwever,
considering the cost difference between it and anything spec'd at
1024x768 or 1280x1024, I decided on the Plus.   Running it at 1024x768
on my HP9000 showed only minor smearing, and that was predominately due
to a misconvergence, I believe.  It did lose a couple of lines at the
top on the HP9000, and I don't know why.  However, my experience would
indicate that it would be easily adjustable, and could also be a
function of the driver board.