Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!cornell!rochester!udel!gatech!ulysses!hector!ekrell
From: ekrell@hector.UUCP (Eduardo Krell)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: What does SVR3 have that SVR2 doesn't?
Message-ID: <10161@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com>
Date: 16 Mar 88 13:35:10 GMT
References: <1062@maynard.BSW.COM>
Sender: netnews@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com
Reply-To: ekrell@hector (Eduardo Krell)
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Murray Hill
Lines: 17

In article <1062@maynard.BSW.COM> campbell@maynard.BSW.COM (Larry Campbell) writes:
>The question I'm really trying to answer is, given a choice
>between SVR2 (for perhaps less money) and SVR3, why should I choose SVR3?

1. RFS

2. STREAMS

3. Shared Libraries

4. Better signal handling


    
    Eduardo Krell                   AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ

    UUCP: {ihnp4,ucbvax}!ulysses!ekrell		ARPA: ekrell@ulysses.att.com