Checksum: 23669 Path: utzoo!utgpu!romwa From: romwa@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu (Mark Dornfeld) Date: Tue, 15-Mar-88 23:18:05 EST Message-ID: <1988Mar15.231805.21739@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu> Organization: University of Toronto Computing Services Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix Subject: Re: XENIX 386 ESDI Crash Summary: Still having problems References: <1988Mar10.163610.27000@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu> <9927@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP> Reply-To: romwa@gpu.utcs.UUCP (Mark Dornfeld) Followup-To: {uunet | philabs | seismo}!steinmetz!crdos1!davidsen Keywords: XENIX ESDI Crash In article <1988Mar10.163610.27000@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu> romwa@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu (Mark Dornfeld) writes: | I think SCO's ESDI version is not quite right yet. I did my | own installation of an SMS OMTI 8620 Controller on a Compaq | [...] | | The system periodically crashes when one of the peripherals is | being heavily used. When extracting a tar archive from | floppy, the system will report: | | memory failure - parity error | omti: controller already in select state | >>Sure sounds familiar! I have seen this on a number of machines now, >>and it was caused by trying to run 16 bit memory. When you get the hard >>disk (1 DMA channel) and the floppy or tape (or serial ports??) and the >>CPU in 32 bit mode all beating the 16 bit memory, it doesn't have time >>to refresh. BANG! parity error. >> >>If you have all 32 bit memory then this is a new one, but if you have >>16 bit memory, pull it out and try again. At least in three cases this >>was one that really was software. This box has all 32bit memory. Since I posted I have replaced the memory, the controller, did a low level disk format, reinstalled (flawlessly), then BOOM!. Down she went when I tried to install the drivers for an eight port board (Consensys). I think this particular Compaq was made on a Monday. I've just about given up and will ship the system back and replace it with a 16Mhz Intel system configured by Consensys with ESDI support (faster code than SCO's). I am heartened to see I'm not the only one with these problems. I've heard lots of war stories about Compaq memory boards. Can they be growing just a little too fast? Their next machine will say it all. I've heard they are trying to license the Microchannel bus. Why doesn't some company (besides TI) harness the 386 to a Nu-bus and market the hell out of it. That should create a wonderful open standard and do justice to the open standards efforts going on. Ah, well, this will not get this machine going tomorrow now, will it? Mark T. Dornfeld Royal Ontario Museum 100 Queens Park Toronto, Ontario, CANADA M5S 2C6 mark@utgpu!rom - or - romwa@utgpu