Xref: utzoo comp.sys.mac:13444 comp.windows.misc:165
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!pasteur!agate!gershwin.berkeley.edu!cswarren
From: cswarren@gershwin.berkeley.edu (Warren Gish;133B Biochem;x3-9219)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac,comp.windows.misc
Subject: Re: A/UX window systems, Mac toolbox, etc
Message-ID: <7330@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: 3 Mar 88 05:14:29 GMT
References: <1710@ssc-vax.UUCP> <579@eplrx7.UUCP> <7550@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: cswarren@gershwin.berkeley.edu.UUCP (Warren Gish)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 13

In article <7550@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> bob@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu (Bob Sutterfield) writes:
>Nobody has yet been able to explain to me why Xerox didn't sue Aple
Is this their problem or yours? :^)
>for "blatantly ripping off" the UI features developed, or at least
>solidified, during PARC's glory days.
The way I heard it, Apple licensed parts of its user interface
from Xerox/PARC.  And I assume the licensing agreement met
with such agreement that law suits weren't suitable.

Warren Gish
IS&T
UC Berkeley
cswarren@violet.berkeley.edu
cswarren@ucbviole.bitnet