Xref: utzoo soc.men:3051 sci.bio:987 Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bbn!uwmcsd1!ig!agate!saturn!chromo!kevin From: kevin@chromo.ucsc.edu (Kevin McLoughlin) Newsgroups: soc.men,sci.bio Subject: Re: Sexual selection Message-ID: <2402@saturn.ucsc.edu> Date: 17 Mar 88 04:55:29 GMT References: <1566@mmm.UUCP> <3138@arthur.cs.purdue.edu> <1164@microsoft.UUCP> <3455@medusa.cs.purdue.edu> <3232@zeus.TEK.COM> <13400@sri-unix.SRI.COM> <913@bingvaxu.cc.binghamton.edu> <25443@cca.CCA.COM> <914@bingvaxu.cc.binghamton.edu> Sender: usenet@saturn.ucsc.edu Reply-To: kevin@chromo.UUCP (Susan Nordmark) Organization: Physics Asylum, University of California, Santa Cruz Lines: 27 In article <914@bingvaxu.cc.binghamton.edu> vu0112@bingvaxu.cc.binghamton.edu (Cliff Joslyn) writes: >But presumably the above scenario was in effect throughout homonid >evolution, and modern dimorphism is the "residual" effect of that. With the proviso that sexual selection works in two ways: 1) females create a selection pressure for males to look like they can provide good genes and (in hominids maybe also) help and companionship in the hard work of raising a primate child to adulthood 2) males compete with each other for the sexual favor of the females, which creates another selection pressure on males for traits that are important in this male-male competition process (dog-and-pony-show, really). A lot of (2) may be why males are usually bigger than females in mammals: in some species (deer) they fight, in other species they just try to scare and impress each other with a mouthful of big teeth (chimps, baboons), colorful or hairy accouterments to the body (lions, orangutans, human males), aggressive show-offy behavior acting as IF they're the meanest SOB around (most mammalian males), etc. So dimorphism MAY be a result of direct female choice for big males but PROBABLY is more likely a result of the games males play with each other. ----------- Susan Nordmark Internet: kevin@chromo.UCSC.edu UUCP: ...ucbvax!ucscc!chromo.kevin Santa Cruz, CA