Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ut-sally!ut-emx!ethan
From: ethan@ut-emx.UUCP (Ethan Tecumseh Vishniac)
Newsgroups: sci.misc
Subject: Re: Omni-Americans
Message-ID: <1058@ut-emx.UUCP>
Date: 3 Mar 88 15:01:16 GMT
References: <5017@uwmcsd1.UUCP>
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
Lines: 15
Summary: Omni?????

In article <5017@uwmcsd1.UUCP>, markh@csd4.milw.wisc.edu (Mark William Hopkins) writes:
> Read Omni instead of Scientific American.  It's much better because it has 
> all things Futuristic in it, be they science fact or science fiction (i.e.
> science yet-to-be-fact).


I have read, and enjoyed many pieces of fiction in Omni.  A few of them
even had a note attached indicating that they were fiction.

I have read Omni cover to cover a couple of times.  I found *damn* little
science.
-- 
 I'm not afraid of dying     Ethan Vishniac, Dept of Astronomy
 I just don't want to be     {charm,ut-sally,ut-ngp,noao}!utastro!ethan
 there when it happens.      (arpanet) ethan@astro.AS.UTEXAS.EDU
    - Woody Allen            (bitnet) ethan%astro.as.utexas.edu@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU