Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att-cb!att-ih!pacbell!ames!ll-xn!mit-eddie!killer!pollux!ti-csl!mips!mmeyer
From: mmeyer@mips.csc.ti.com (Mark Meyer)
Newsgroups: sci.misc
Subject: Re: Omni-Americans
Message-ID: <43947@ti-csl.CSNET>
Date: 7 Mar 88 20:34:43 GMT
References: <5017@uwmcsd1.UUCP>
Sender: news@ti-csl.CSNET
Reply-To: mmeyer@mips.UUCP (Mark Meyer)
Organization: TI Computer Science Center, Dallas
Lines: 12
Posted: Mon Mar  7 14:34:43 1988

In article <5017@uwmcsd1.UUCP> markh@csd4.milw.wisc.edu (Mark William Hopkins) writes:
>Read Omni instead of Scientific American.  It's much better because it has 
>all things Futuristic in it, be they science fact or science fiction (i.e.
>science yet-to-be-fact).

	...or fantasy (eg, the AntiMatter section).  :-)

--
Mark Meyer          USENET: {ut-sally!im4u,convex!smu,sun!texsun}!ti-csl!mmeyer
Texas Instruments, Inc.                                   CSNET : mmeyer@TI-CSL
(SET! TI-RESPONSIBLE-FOR-MSG? #!FALSE)
 "Would it save you all a lot of trouble if I simply gave up and went mad now?"