Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att-cb!att-ih!pacbell!ptsfa!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!bbn!rochester!udel!princeton!mind!eliot
From: eliot@mind.UUCP (Eliot Handleman)
Newsgroups: sci.psychology
Subject: Re: Living in the 20th C
Message-ID: <1981@mind.UUCP>
Date: 8 Mar 88 07:09:40 GMT
References: <1880@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> <1887@physics.UUCP> <9266@ism780c.UUCP> <1979@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>
Reply-To: eliot@mind.UUCP (Eliot Handleman)
Organization: Cognitive Science, Princeton University
Lines: 14

In article <1979@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> tom@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Thomas C Hajdu) writes:
>When I posted my original question about (schizophrenic/
>post-structuralist/post-modern/??) perception I was
>sort of hoping to hear about books that I might read that
>refered to my experience: Mcluhan, Kroker, Chambers, Foster,
>Kern, Venturi, Turkle, Lowe, Foucault, Eco come to mind
>as writers who bounce off of these feelings in one
>way or another.



Ok, I'll bite: in what way exactly do those authors bounce off of those
feelings (which, I seem to recall, had to do with a preference for switching
TV channels over reading long books)?