Xref: utzoo can.politics:1511 misc.taxes:544
Path: utzoo!mnetor!micomvax!ray
From: ray@micomvax.UUCP (Ray Dunn)
Newsgroups: can.politics,misc.taxes
Subject: Re: unintelligible legislation
Message-ID: <944@micomvax.UUCP>
Date: 17 Mar 88 15:51:29 GMT
References: <1988Feb27.225704.29588@lsuc.uucp> <490@xios.XIOS.UUCP> <1988Mar14.185306.19552@lsuc.uucp>
Reply-To: ray@micomvax.UUCP (Ray Dunn)
Distribution: can
Organization: Philips Electronics Ltd. (TDS - Montreal) St. Laurent P.Q., Canada
Lines: 18

In article <1988Mar14.185306.19552@lsuc.uucp> dave@lsuc.uucp (David Sherman)
writes:
>
>(By the way, 3 people sent me their interpretations of what the
>provision says. The only correct one was gordan@maccs, Gordan Palameta.)
                          ^^^^^^^ 

Does this mean it coincided with an official published interpretation, or is
Dave saying "the only one which coincided with my (Dave's) interpretation",

Are we on dangerous ground here?  Is Dave liable for the opinions he
publishes on the tax laws?  Should he be making disclaimers?  Can he make
disclaimers when he explicitly states that he is a tax consultant??  etc.
etc.

Over to you Dave.

Ray Dunn..  {philabs, mnetor, musocs}!micomvax!ray