Xref: utzoo comp.unix.questions:6207 comp.unix.wizards:7320 comp.arch:4032
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bbn!rochester!cornell!batcomputer!sun.soe.clarkson.edu!rob
From: rob@sun.soe.clarkson.edu (Rob Logan)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.wizards,comp.arch
Subject: Re: RFS vs. NFS
Message-ID: <616@sun.soe.clarkson.edu>
Date: 24 Mar 88 13:39:20 GMT
References: <3211@phri.UUCP>
Organization: Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY
Lines: 13

From article <3211@phri.UUCP>, by roy@phri.UUCP (Roy Smith):
> jk@apple.UUCP (John Kullmann) writes:
>> Everyone wants and uses NFS and no one wants or uses RFS.
> 
> To which gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>) responds:
>> Funny, I thought the difference was that RFS is NFS done right.

I think the point is rather mute when you consider System V.4
is shipping with NFS.

			Rob

rob@sun.soe.clarkson.edu