Xref: utzoo comp.unix.questions:6208 comp.unix.wizards:7322 comp.arch:4033
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!uwmcsd1!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!zdenko
From: zdenko@csd4.milw.wisc.edu (Zdenko Tomasic)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.wizards,comp.arch
Subject: Re: RFS vs. NFS
Message-ID: <5370@uwmcsd1.UUCP>
Date: 24 Mar 88 14:45:30 GMT
References: <3211@phri.UUCP> <616@sun.soe.clarkson.edu>
Sender: daemon@uwmcsd1.UUCP
Reply-To: zdenko@csd4.milw.wisc.edu (Zdenko Tomasic)
Organization: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Lines: 28

In article <616@sun.soe.clarkson.edu> rob@sun.soe.clarkson.edu (Rob Logan) writes:
>From article <3211@phri.UUCP>, by roy@phri.UUCP (Roy Smith):
>> jk@apple.UUCP (John Kullmann) writes:
>>> Everyone wants and uses NFS and no one wants or uses RFS.
>> 
>> To which gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>) responds:
>>> Funny, I thought the difference was that RFS is NFS done right.
>
>I think the point is rather mute when you consider System V.4
                                                    ^^^^^^^^^^
>is shipping with NFS.
 ^^^^^^^^^^^
 right now?


>
>			Rob
>
>rob@sun.soe.clarkson.edu


Zdenko Tomasic
UWM, Chem. Dept.
Milwaukee,WI,53201
__________________________________________________________
UUCP: ihnp4!uwmcsd1!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!zdenko
ARPA: zdenko@csd4.milw.wisc.edu
__________________________________________________________